Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jul 15, 2011, 07:03 AM // 07:03   #21
Forge Runner
 
Iuris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Crazy ducks from the Forest
Profession: W/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Anet is a BUSINESS. They don't owe us any loyalty, nor do we to them. Well, of course, they'd like for us to be happy for general "I want to make the world a bit nicer for everyone", too, they are passionate game makers, after all, but in the end, they still need to take a paycheck home at teh end of the month, and that money has to come from somewhere.

Instead, they have two concerns: a product that they sell and a reputation that will, hopefully, convince people to consider their other products. Whatever they choose to do with GW1 only has a point if it gets you to spend money eventually.

ANYTHING they do for GW1 is essentially "Look at how much we care for an old game we hardly gets sales from, and what this means for our future games, if you buy them." And if you think about it a bit, you'll notice that compared to other game companies who don't actually demand you pay them money monthly, they do a great job.

P.S. 6 years and loyalty... I was a bit late coming to the game, having arrived between Nightfall and Factions, but if I were thinking about my loyalty, I'd sooner point out that I have nothing left to buy in the online shop, than point out that I have... er... I think 6000+ hours in GW?
Iuris is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 08:48 AM // 08:48   #22
Furnace Stoker
 
Tommy's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Guild: [Bone]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Jeez, people sure know how to always want a little bit more. I think it's nice of them to give people who are willing to pay real money for their costumes a little bit extra. I also don't see how tonics in arena's would work, it would be very annoying having one of the golem tonics running through your screen.
And about the loyalty, it all depends on how you define loyalty (though I find the whole word in the relation with a gamingcompany misplaced). You could define loyalty as buying all the costumes as well. Keeping your company going to create stuff you want, now that is loyal! Having bought a game 6 years ago, profiting of their servers, their updates and all of their work for all those years and still expect more makes you a parasite, not loyal lol. Be glad there is no monthly fee, I much as hell prefer Anet making their money this way, so I can at least behave like the parasite I am and use their content without contributing anymore. I feel, and you should too jazilla, more in a position of apologizing then in a position of complaining.
Tommy's is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 10:48 AM // 10:48   #23
Academy Page
 
ruksak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: INDY
Guild: PvE
Profession: P/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy's View Post
Jeez, people sure know how to always want a little bit more. I think it's nice of them to give people who are willing to pay real money for their costumes a little bit extra. I also don't see how tonics in arena's would work, it would be very annoying having one of the golem tonics running through your screen.
And about the loyalty, it all depends on how you define loyalty (though I find the whole word in the relation with a gamingcompany misplaced). You could define loyalty as buying all the costumes as well. Keeping your company going to create stuff you want, now that is loyal! Having bought a game 6 years ago, profiting of their servers, their updates and all of their work for all those years and still expect more makes you a parasite, not loyal lol. Be glad there is no monthly fee, I much as hell prefer Anet making their money this way, so I can at least behave like the parasite I am and use their content without contributing anymore. I feel, and you should too jazilla, more in a position of apologizing then in a position of complaining.
WHAT THE FACK!?!

Are you f'ing serious, guy?

"Parasite"?

"He should apologize"?

Playing that game ain't a friggin privilege. I bought their damn games, all of them. With the expectation, one garnered through advertising statements they made, that the game would stay fresh. Instead they bailed years ago in an effort to endeavor to create an updated WoW knock-off (GW2).

Tumbleweeds roll through Tyria and I should feel parasitic for continuing to play and desire some semblance of fresh content? Your attempts to paint Jazilla as a spongy leech are misguided at best. Dude is just making suggestions that would garner a higher level of appreciation from Anets customer base.

YES, it is a business. But I am the customer and I expect service after the sale. Constant baiting to give them more money for virtually no added content is dually noted. Okay, I pay $10 here and there and I have earned the right to wear a funny hat?

WoC was about 2 years too late for me to get on me knees and thank Anet. Whats more is it seemed to fall well short of expectations so far and you want me, and people like me, to apologize to them?

Hey, I'm sorry they didn't sell more copies early on. I'm sorry their subscribers didn't line their pockets as deep as they may have wished. I'm sorry that calm suggestions are perceived as greed. How's that for an apology?

There is a fine line between complaining and suggesting. I recommend you focus a tad more and see that the line isn't so blurry.
ruksak is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 10:50 AM // 10:50   #24
Forge Runner
 
Swingline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere far away from you
Guild: The Mirror of Reason[SNOW]
Profession: W/
Default

Personally I couldn't give a rats ass about stupid tonics. To me tonics are the lamest thing ever, even more lame than mini pets.

For the option to wear your costumes in holiday pvp arenas I couldn't care about that one bit either.

I use to love Guild Wars. You couldn't keep me from this game, but a series of events over 4 years would shake my loyalty for this company. I wouldn't call myself a loyal customer to anet anymore. Anet promised it's players(yes, promised) a quality campaign every 6 months. I thought awesome that's a lot of work, they must be dedicated. Just like prophecies I shelled out top dollar and bought the collectors edition of Factions the first day. I was there 10 minutes before the store opened and if they had a midnight release I would have been the first in line. After thoroughly enjoying the greatness of factions for 6 months I was ready to buy Nightfall. Again I was there 10 minutes before the store opened to purchase it. to be blunt Nightfall was a disappointment. The content seemed bland and uninteresting but some people liked it so I thought it was just me and that I had to bite the bullet till next campaign. Shortly after release of Nightfall my GvG guild dissolved because of how much Nightfall changed the game. All my GvG buddies lost interest and did care for the direction the game was taking with pvp, I blame mostly the skills. Despite this I still played and when I heard about GW: Utopia I was once again excited about the upcoming campaign. For weeks I was teased with the 2 new professions and loads of artwork, not to mention I am a fan of the whole Aztec culture. When I heard it was scrapped I was incredibly disappointed and after buying EoTN I felt like I gave them my money for a half-ass made game. Half way through EoTN I quit, gave a bunch of my stuff away and went off to WoW. Anet told me to expect the GW2 beta late 2008 and I payed attention to any news on GW2 but when summer 2009 hit I again lost interest. Somehow I ended up back in GW and am now waiting for GW2. If this is not loyalty I don't know what is and so far I feel like I was stripped naked and left in the desert.

My point is if a company cannot keep the promises it makes and return loyalty then where does that leave us.
Swingline is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 11:29 AM // 11:29   #25
Forge Runner
 
Iuris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Crazy ducks from the Forest
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruksak View Post
I bought their damn games, all of them. With the expectation, one garnered through advertising statements they made, that the game would stay fresh. Instead they bailed years ago in an effort to endeavor to create an updated WoW knock-off (GW2).
Wrong. You can be angry that Anet abandoned the expansion model, that's the expectation we used to have. Expectation or new content for free, however, is not justified. Well, you could argue you expected it, but you could argue you expected to be actually given that bridge you bought.

Quote:
Tumbleweeds roll through Tyria and I should feel parasitic for continuing to play and desire some semblance of fresh content? Your attempts to paint Jazilla as a spongy leech are misguided at best. Dude is just making suggestions that would garner a higher level of appreciation from Anets customer base.

YES, it is a business. But I am the customer and I expect service after the sale. Constant baiting to give them more money for virtually no added content is dually noted. Okay, I pay $10 here and there and I have earned the right to wear a funny hat?
That's the problem here - the costumers have come to have too great expectations. A few developers started to build up their reputation by offering above-the-expectations additional post launch content, and for some reason, instead of seeing those companies as exceptionally good cases, the player base became spoiled and started to consider this as normal.

Although I consider the price of a costume as excessive, I'll grant you that, I'd say they're worth maybe 2$, really. However, the game as a total, all costumes included, has offered me FAR more than I have spent by now, so I consider buying the costumes an act of repaying the earlier great deal I got from the game itself.

Quote:
WoC was about 2 years too late for me to get on me knees and thank Anet. Whats more is it seemed to fall well short of expectations so far and you want me, and people like me, to apologize to them?
Amazingly, "we" generally don't have a problem with people not liking WoC. It did fall a bit short of my expectations, too, after all. What "we" object to is people showing an unreasonable feeling of entitlement.

Quote:
There is a fine line between complaining and suggesting. I recommend you focus a tad more and see that the line isn't so blurry.
Indeed, and it has been crossed by the OTHER guys. Also, there is also a not so fine line between suggesting the reasonable and unreasonable.
Iuris is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 11:30 AM // 11:30   #26
Desert Nomad
 
RedDog91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Farming for Nick gifts
Profession: R/
Default

Both sides of this argument (specifically Tommy's and ruksak's latest posts) are so extreme in their stance that I can't take either seriously.
RedDog91 is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 11:40 AM // 11:40   #27
Departed from Tyria
 
Shayne Hawke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Guild: Clan Dethryche [dth]
Profession: R/
Default

So, we're pretty much deciding to throw this entire thread off-topic from the start, huh? This update isn't about your goddamn "loyalty".

The change to the festival hat trader that allowed the hats to be worn over armor in PvE caused an oversight that prevented these hats from being used in festival arenas where people had commonly been using them before. It seems that ANet finally decided to restore that functionality, and also give that ability to costumes as well, since they work on the same system as festival hats. Personally, I think that allowing the body sections of the costumes to be valid is going over the line, due to confusion issues arising in Snowball, but I suppose that's a minor issue for now. Allowing players to use tonics would have a similar fault. If they wanted to get more selective for Snowball, they would have to turn it into an arena that is both PvP and doesn't allow these specific festival items. They may have to do similar things to other arenas to allow some tonics but disallow others, based on how much of a block of sight they become, or how much they aren't in sight (in the case of the bunnies), but that's probably getting too fine into detail.

The reason tonics aren't being allowed use in festival arenas is either because it was an oversight on account of them never being like that before, or because ANet actually recognizes that a few of the tonics would cause issues in PvP that they don't want to have to go through and hand-pick which tonics are valid and where they're valid for so that they do it right.

The only thing ANet needs to do now is adjust the Gamer points and disable Flux, and the festival arenas will be right back where they need to be.
Shayne Hawke is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 12:00 PM // 12:00   #28
Academy Page
 
ruksak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: INDY
Guild: PvE
Profession: P/W
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDog91 View Post
Both sides of this argument (specifically Tommy's and ruksak's latest posts) are so extreme in their stance that I can't take either seriously.
How is my stance extreme?

I would say it is fine business advice. Maybe if they released new chapters, tons of free "fun" items and content, the game wouldn't be on life support? Maybe they'd sell more of these costume packs at $10 a shot if their were more people still playing? Has this not occurred to anyone?

Why would I want to buy a costume pack if I barely play? I barely play because it is, in essence, same ole same ole. Remove the monotony by way of new content and they have provided themselves with an increased profit margin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shayne Hawke
So, we're pretty much deciding to throw this entire thread off-topic from the start, huh? This update isn't about your goddamn "loyalty".
We are discussing the merits of updating useless things as opposed to updating more pertinent content.
ruksak is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 12:03 PM // 12:03   #29
Forge Runner
 
Swingline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere far away from you
Guild: The Mirror of Reason[SNOW]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shayne Hawke View Post
So, we're pretty much deciding to throw this entire thread off-topic from the start, huh?
What do you expect from such an incredibly small update...
Swingline is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 12:27 PM // 12:27   #30
Furnace Stoker
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Guild: GWAR
Profession: Me/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruksak View Post
WHAT THE FACK!?!

Are you f'ing serious, guy?

"Parasite"?

"He should apologize"?

Playing that game ain't a friggin privilege. I bought their damn games, all of them. With the expectation, one garnered through advertising statements they made, that the game would stay fresh. Instead they bailed years ago in an effort to endeavor to create an updated WoW knock-off (GW2).

Tumbleweeds roll through Tyria and I should feel parasitic for continuing to play and desire some semblance of fresh content? Your attempts to paint Jazilla as a spongy leech are misguided at best. Dude is just making suggestions that would garner a higher level of appreciation from Anets customer base.

YES, it is a business. But I am the customer and I expect service after the sale. Constant baiting to give them more money for virtually no added content is dually noted. Okay, I pay $10 here and there and I have earned the right to wear a funny hat?

WoC was about 2 years too late for me to get on me knees and thank Anet. Whats more is it seemed to fall well short of expectations so far and you want me, and people like me, to apologize to them?

Hey, I'm sorry they didn't sell more copies early on. I'm sorry their subscribers didn't line their pockets as deep as they may have wished. I'm sorry that calm suggestions are perceived as greed. How's that for an apology?

There is a fine line between complaining and suggesting. I recommend you focus a tad more and see that the line isn't so blurry.
Compared to every other game I have bought over the last 30 + years this one has received the most updates bug fixes additional content etc.

Most games get no fixes others a couple in the first few months of release then nothing.

So if anet are treating us badly what does that say about every other games company
gremlin is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 12:54 PM // 12:54   #31
Jungle Guide
 
stretchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Guild: Untimely Demise [Err了] - SOHK
Default

Be happy they are making changes to the game still. As for the tonics, it makes no sense to allow them to be in pvp areas because of the pathing issues they would cause. Just like Mox, it is good they arent allowed in any pvp formats
stretchs is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 12:54 PM // 12:54   #32
Desert Nomad
 
Evil_Necro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 川崎区、日本
Guild: currently guildless..
Profession: Rt/
Default

whine whine whine whine..

Enjoy the wintersday, have fun and don't be jealous.. share the joys and we all come back home in peace

Cheers
Evil_Necro is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 01:04 PM // 13:04   #33
Forge Runner
 
Swingline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere far away from you
Guild: The Mirror of Reason[SNOW]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gremlin View Post
Compared to every other game I have bought over the last 30 + years this one has received the most updates bug fixes additional content etc.

Most games get no fixes others a couple in the first few months of release then nothing.

So if anet are treating us badly what does that say about every other games company
Because GWs usually has major bugs that have to be fixed such as the one stated in the OP. I played WoW for 5 years and I ran into 2 very minor bugs that didn't even affect gameplay. Not to mention Guild Wars would need constant updates since players burn through content so fast it forced Arena Net to abandon it for GW2 which has 80 levels and more endgame content than its predecessor would have if it had 10 campaigns. Why do you think people have been talking about the stale state of Guild Wars the past year. If anet is so generous with bug fixes where is the bug fix to my beloved JQ?
Swingline is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 01:08 PM // 13:08   #34
Krytan Explorer
 
Aljasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Default

Who cares about some stupid costumes and hats in holiday pvp? It's not like you gain any advantage over anybody and the costumes are either bugged or fugly.
Aljasha is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2011, 01:49 PM // 13:49   #35
EXCESSIVE FLUTTERCUSSING
 
Kattar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: SMS (lolgw2placeholder)
Profession: Me/
Default



Closed.
__________________
All seems lost now, but still we must fight on.
Kattar is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 PM // 18:56.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("